Penal substitution
I have not posted in a while; very involved in some personal matters, having January fatigue, and working on academic papers and presentations. It seems my Kallman's post is popular and I get a lot of hits from porn sites. To the extent I read more advanced theology, it seems that penal substitution has become a hot topic of debate. Since this is all that I was taught in my Christian development, it is strange to me that it is a "hot topic." How could the cross be interpreted any other way? Of course, it is, and has been, specifically as an example of suffering (not entirely wrong) or in other ways. From this article in CT, https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/january-february/eleonore-stump-atonement.html on a new book about atonement, the reviewer quotes the author: (what follows in red is quoted) According to interpretations of the Anselmian kind, what God does to act compatibly with his goodness or justice is in fact to fail to punish the guilty or to