Birth of Christ
Tomorrow I am teaching on the birth of Christ. Here is the lesson. It seems out of place in the calendar but so it goes.
This is one of those theological words that doesn’t appear
in the Bible but is used to cover a large, difficult to understand
concept. “Carn” means flesh; The Eternal
Son of God became man with flesh and blood in a specific time and place and was
named Jesus, the Christ. He was/is Lord
(not to be confused with LORD in Old Testament). This introduces the word trinity, another
word that is almost impossible for us to grasp and we make human attempts to
understand this, which is a mystery. A
mystery is a Bible word for something not revealed until a specific time, but
there is more to it than that.
“The biblical idea of mystery, then,
reminds Christians that God holds the course of human events in his hands and
has so shaped them that they work for the salvation of his people. It also
demonstrates the graciousness of God in revealing his redemptive purposes to
prophets and apostles and, through them, to all who are willing to hear.” Frank Thielman, Eaton’s Bible Dictionary
“The calling of the Gentiles into the
Christian Church, so designated ( Ephesians 1:9 Ephesians 1:10 ; 3:8-11 ; Colossians
1:25-27 ); a truth undiscoverable except by revelation, long hid, now made
manifest. The resurrection of the dead (1 Corinthians
15:51 ), and other doctrines which need to be explained but which cannot be
fully understood by finite intelligence ( Matthew 13:11 ; Romans 11:25 ; 1 Corinthians
13:2 ); the union between Christ and his people symbolized by the marriage
union ( Ephesians
5:31 Ephesians
5:32 ; comp 6:19
); the seven stars and the seven candlesticks ( Revelation 1:20
); and the woman clothed in scarlet ( 17:7 ), are also
in this sense mysteries. The anti-Christian power working in his day is called
by the apostle ( 2 Thessalonians
2:7 ) the "mystery of iniquity." Eaton’s Bible Dictionary
The incarnation, trinity, and mystery are
three theological words that are important to this lesson on the birth of
Jesus.
I can’t get into this much more without
discussing The Shack. First, I read it; I don’t believe in
criticizing something I haven’t seen or read.
I am going to be prophetic here, which means I will say things you won’t
agree with and may make you mad.
1.
Hollywood is not to be depended on for
your Christian growth. Hollywood wants
to make money, and since Paul Young’s book sold two million copies, they knew
they would make money off a movie.
2.
Something being popular does not make it
right. Just because two million people
or more read that book did not make it right in its teaching.
3.
Paul Young has written and spoken in other
places where he has clearly denied Bible doctrines like the need for salvation,
hell, and authority of the Bible. He was
raised as a missionary kid but abused and he has issues, which come out in the
book. You need to see the book as him
trying to work out his psychological problems including hatred for a legalistic
and mean father.
4.
If you enjoyed the movie, fine, just don’t take
it for the Bible. It’s not, very far
from it. We don’t need a shack to know
God loves us supremely, is kind, gracious, good. Romans 8:32 “He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for
us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?”
So, where does that leave us?
God the Son came to earth as a baby. He did so to teach us
the gospel and reveal the nature and will of God (the mystery part), to start
his church/bride/body (not a new version of Israel), and die to be the last,
final sacrifice for the sins of the world (our rebellion against God personally
and corporately) so that eventually the universe would be restored to what God
intended it to be.
Matthew and Luke tell us about the facts of Jesus’
birth.
Read the two stories.
What do you see as different in the two?
Matthew 1:18-end of 2.
Matthew tells us the story in terms of how it fulfills Old
Testament prophecy. That’s why your copy
of the Bible might have italicized words where it quotes Isaiah or other
prophets. His version is mostly for the
Jews. His other name is Levi. He writes about the dreams (5) that led to
the story and deliverance. He places it
in the context of the politics, with Herod, the fake king of Israel trying to
secure his place as king by committing horrible crimes. He talks about the magi
and their gifts.
Luke 2:1-24
Luke tells us the story like an historian or reporter with
more emphasis on small facts and details.
He emphasizes the women, Elizabeth, Mary, and Anna. He emphasizes that the people were poor and
humble: the stable, manger, shepherds,
elderly people in the temple.
We see a lot of contrasts in these accounts. Poor vs. rich; powerless/humble vs. worldly
powerful; believing vs. unbelieving; accepting vs. rejection; sincere vs.
deceptive; happy vs. angry; compassionate vs. mean/cruel.
These two accounts give us the details and history. The rest of the New Testament explains
it:
1.
incarnation, God the Son, the Word of God,
became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the
only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14-16).
2.
Identification: Mark 1:9; Luke 7:34; Hebrews 4:14-15; Matthew
27:46(cross)
3.
Imitation:
I Peter 2:21 For to this you were called, because
Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps.
Comments