Post 10 of Study: Hebrews 1

-

Briefly, we will look at the end of this chapter. From verse 8 on the writer is quoting First Testament, and the question remains, to me at least, why he is applying these specifically to Jesus Christ rather than God in general. That is perhaps a question deeper than I can answer here, but the writer does in his attempt to argue that Jesus is superior to all other possible means of salvation or faith--angels, priests, sacrifices, etc. Angels being the first, the writer uses Psalm 45:6-7, Psalm 102:25-27, and Psalm 110:1, and indirectly probably other passages in Psalms, to prove that angels are never addressed in certain ways and are never ascribed certain attributes. The three main characteristics here are:

  • The Son is enthroned as King
  • The Son is Creator of a Creation that changes and decays but He Himself does not change or fail. 
  • The Son is victorious (enemies are footstool).

In context, at least 8-9 and 13 seem to apply to the Messiah; 10-12 are less clear, at least to me. Of course, I don't get to make that call about whether the writer of Hebrews got it wrong or right; if it's right everywhere else, it can't be partially wrong in how he applies Psalms to support the deity of Christ. He has already established from New and First Testament scriptures that Christ was Creator. 

This, of course, brings us to deeper questions about which theologians have struggled for 2,000 years. Is there a difference between Jesus the Man and God the Son? Did Jesus exist before conception? Did God prepare a body and then at some point make Jesus the Man special, endowed with some being or consciousness that made him able to be Savior? And so on. The writer of Hebrews seems to say No, Yes, No. God has spoken to us through His Son (not Jesus who became the Son as some point), but Jesus the Man did "earn" something through his obedience and experience as a human.  

Does your head hurt? Mine does. But that is what beauty does. We think beauty comforts; I don't think so. I remember when I saw Guernica in the Sophia Real Museum in Madrid, when I saw the Rockies for the first time and Niagara Falls. I gasped, and wept, and was overwhelmed. I did not feel comforted. 

(The Mona Lisa gave me none of these feelings. I was kind of bleh on that one, sorry.) 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kallman's Syndrome: The Secret Best Kept

-
I went to my cardiologist yesterday.   Every year I have to wear a Holter monitor for a day because of a heart ablation I had in 2007.   If you don’t know what a Holter monitor is, it’s a 24-hour mobile, wires-hanging-off-your-body EKG.   The nurse practitioner saw me, (not the doctor, which is ok because his voice puts me to sleep).   She was very sweet.   She asked me if I was still taking Estradiol and Progesterin.   “No,” I said. “I’ve totally gone off those.   I was on them for a very long time and I wanted to be sure to stop.” What I didn’t tell her is how long I actually had taken those hormones.   37 years.   I started with HRT when I was 17 because I have Kallman’s Syndrome.   You may never meet a person who has this condition.   It only affects 1 in 10,000 people (or 1 in 86,000, according to one source) so that’s quite a range and far more males have it than females (as do most negative things).   So, being female, I am quite an oddit
Read more

Do I Really Have to See the Barbie Movie?

-
 You know, I was going to write an essay about the Barbie movie .  I am pretty close to deciding that I don't need to spend $8 or more (plus gasoline), 3 hours, and some brain cells looking at pink (only pretty in its natural settings) silliness.  Therefore, I think I will also save the time writing this trying to explain why I probably won't see it unless it comes on YouTube and I'm too tired to do anything else.  Some are talking about it like it's the most profound art of the summer and an insightful exploration of sexual power dynamics. I have enough problems already. And I watched the other half of Barbenheimer already, Oppenheimer (it is brilliant except for the unnecessary and nauseating sex, which I guess was put in there to show what a womanizer he was).  I've already spent my 3 hours on movies for the summer.  Oh, and three on Sound of Freedom, but that was obligatory. And worth it; despite the controversies (ginned up by media that will attack anything
Read more